|
Heather Locklear Arrested for DUI |
|
|
|
|
Sunday, 28 September 2008 21:28 |
|

SANTA BARBARA, CA (ddamm.com) - Officials reveal that Heather Locklear was arrested for drunk driving in Santa Barbara Saturday evening. The 47 year old actress was charged for suspicion of driving under the influence of prescription drugs. A mug shot of the actress was released by the Santa Barbra County Sheriff department revealing no makeup, bags under her eyes and unbleached roots.
Locklear caught the attention of residents in the wealthy community of Montecito due to her odd behavior. California Highway Patrol spokesman Tom Marshall stated, "She was observed by a citizen pulling out of a parking lot and the women (witness) thought she was driving erratically." Furthermore, "She (witness) didn't know who she (Locklear) was."
After seeing the Locklear stopping and getting in and out of her car several times, the witness then called 911. Upon arrival of a uniformed officer, Locklear was said to be blocking a lane on Highway 192.
Heather Locklear submitted to field sobriety tests and apprently passed but there was a suspicion of being under the influence of drugs. California Highway Patrol CHP revealed, "She was evaluated by a drug recognition expert, who concluded Ms. Locklear was under the influence of a controlled substance, and could not safely operate a motor vehicle." Heather Locklear wasbooked and released later that evening on $5,000 bail.
|
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 29 September 2008 14:21 )
|
|
Friday, 12 September 2008 10:10 |
|
BREA, CA (ddamm.com) - A fellow DDAMM member was drunk driving and received a blood test result of 0.10. He believes his rights were violated because the officer never read the miranda rights. Does this mean that the police report is inadmissible in court including the blood test?
Unfortunately, the blood test is not affected by failure to read his miranda rights. The miranda rights is only an issue post arrest. The fact that the miranda rights were not read means that statements after the arrest may be inadmissible in court.
|
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 25 September 2008 13:17 )
|
|
Playing Hooky from DUI Classes |
|
|
|
|
Friday, 05 September 2008 20:35 |
MORENO VALLEY, CA (ddamm.com) - One individual stopped attending DUI classes with once with the judge only issuing an admonition that first instance. He then stopped going again but this time he got a bench warrant. The individual claims these classes are so boring and he's been attending for many months.
These classes are licensed by the DMV with the purpose of educating drinkers so they can get their licenses back. So no class means no license. Also not attending can equal a misdemeanor and possible jail time.
|
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 25 September 2008 13:17 )
|
|
Field Breath Test Acceptable in Court? |
|
|
|
|
Thursday, 28 August 2008 06:08 |
ORANGE COUNTY, CA (ddamm.com) - One writer submitted to the field sobriety Portable Breath Test (PAS) yet received no further tests after being arrested and sent to the police station. He inquires whether or not he can get off on a technicality since further deep lung or blood tests were not completed as further diagnostics down at the station. There are many portable devices that are not acceptable in court but California Department of Justice usually deploys portable field devices that are acceptable. If the device was a Drager EPAS then likely it is acceptable.
|
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 25 September 2008 13:20 )
|
|
Wednesday, 20 August 2008 11:08 |
|
SAN BERNADINO, CA (ddamm.com) - This story comes from a lady that was at a wedding reception with her husband. After an argument, the women drove home and parked in the garage. Several minutes later, an officer shows up at the door. The officer said he was just up the street and wanted to check if things were OK asking her to submit to sobriety testing which was refused. After being handcuffed in front of her children, she relented and agreed to the field tests and failed the breathalyzer exam. She was arrested and the car was impounded and towed right out of her garage. Is this legal? Can't one claim that they drank a little bit of liquer after getting into the safe confines of her home? It depends on the jury and most likely they'll believe the experts. Absorbing alcohol takes about a half an hour depending on one's prevous food consumption and metabolism. The woman also made the critical mistake of submitting to the field tests. She should accepted being arrested then visiting the station to take a blood test which is more accurate and takes longer for results to return. Instead of having her license revoked, she'd be able to get her license back from the DMV within 10 days and the courts would decide the fate of her license several months later.
|
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 25 September 2008 13:21 )
|
|
Sunday, 10 August 2008 11:14 |
|
SAN DIEGO, CA (ddamm.com) - There are some that believe police are handing out DUI arrests as a revenue stream similar to traffic tickets for speeding. This is far more more myth than reality. The easiest revenue by far are the moving violations where there is less hassle and resistance with no field tests required. In San Diego, many SDPD and Sheriffs I know recommend never giving out a DUI unless the person is stinking drunk, being confrontational, or causes property damage. The amount of paperwork and time that goes into a charge is a long commitment. Because of DUI attorneys, the cops will also have to go to court - and often on their days off to support their charges.
|
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 25 September 2008 13:23 )
|
|
MADD Volunteer Charged with DUI |
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, 15 May 2007 19:09 |
|
NORTH BRANFORD, CT (ddamm.com) - Police said MADD Vounteer Amy D'Aniello of North Branford was charged with DUI and speeding after being stopped for allegedly driving up to 75mph in a 45mph zone. Ironically, D'Aniello attended a MADD sponsored presentation at the state capital the previous month in which she and other volunteers sought sticter laws against drunk driving.
During a routine traffic surveillance around 2:30 AM, a police officer said his olfactory senses detected the presence of alcohol on D'Aniello's breath. She was tested in the field which resulted in an unspecified amount higher than the 0.08 legal limit. Executive director of the Connecticut Chapter of MADD, Janice Heggie Margolis stated, "I'm profoundly disappointed." Furthermore, "I hope she accepts the consequences and is held accountable. I'm disappointed that a volunteer who knew about designating a sober driver, should know about standard practices, chose to drink and drive."
|
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 23 September 2008 19:29 )
|
|